The SPARK Framework: Strategic Playbook for Activating Remarkable Kinetic Advertising

Stunt advertising represents the convergence of guerrilla marketing tactics, experiential branding, and viral media strategies designed to create disproportionate attention through unexpected, memorable brand activations. This playbook provides a comprehensive framework for conceptualizing, executing, and measuring stunt advertising campaigns that generate outsized returns on attention and create lasting brand memorability.

---

Part I: Theoretical Foundations

1.1 Defining Stunt Advertising

Stunt advertising, also termed “publicity stunts” or “marketing spectacles,” refers to orchestrated events or activations designed to generate attention, conversation, and media coverage through their unexpected, remarkable, or boundary-pushing nature. Unlike traditional advertising that interrupts consumers with paid messages, stunt advertising creates events worth discussing (Godin, 2008).

The fundamental distinction lies in earned attention versus purchased attention. As Berger (2013) notes in his analysis of viral content, “remarkable content triggers word of mouth not because it’s advertised, but because it’s worth talking about” (p. 89). Stunt advertising operates on this principle, creating moments that transcend traditional advertising boundaries to become cultural talking points.

1.2 The Psychology of Surprise Marketing

The psychological foundation of stunt advertising rests on several key cognitive principles:

Pattern Interruption: Humans are pattern-recognition machines, constantly predicting what comes next based on environmental cues. When these predictions are violated, the brain experiences what Friston (2010) terms “prediction error,” triggering heightened attention and encoding. Stunt advertising deliberately violates expected patterns in commercial spaces, creating memorable disruptions that enhance recall.

The Von Restorff Effect: Also known as the isolation effect, this principle demonstrates that distinctive stimuli are better remembered than common ones (Hunt, 1995). In an advertising landscape saturated with similar messages, the unusual nature of stunt advertising creates distinctiveness that enhances memorability by up to 40% compared to conventional advertisements (Pieters, Warlop, & Wedel, 2002).

Emotional Arousal and Memory: Neurological research demonstrates that emotional arousal enhances memory consolidation through amygdala activation (McGaugh, 2004). Effective stunt advertising triggers emotional responses—surprise, delight, shock, or amusement—that cement the experience in long-term memory far more effectively than rational messaging.

Social Currency Theory: Berger and Milkman’s (2012) research on viral content reveals that people share content that makes them look knowledgeable, cool, or “in-the-know.” Stunt advertising, when executed well, provides social currency that motivates sharing behavior, transforming witnesses into brand ambassadors.

1.3 Drop Marketing and Scarcity Dynamics

Drop marketing represents a specific application of stunt advertising principles, characterized by surprise product releases with limited availability. This strategy weaponizes several psychological principles:

Scarcity Principle: Cialdini’s (2006) work on influence demonstrates that perceived scarcity increases desirability. When Supreme releases limited-edition items or Beyoncé drops an album unannounced, the scarcity creates urgency that drives immediate action and heightened media attention.

FOMO (Fear of Missing Out): Przybylski et al. (2013) define FOMO as “a pervasive apprehension that others might be having rewarding experiences from which one is absent.” Drop marketing exploits this by creating exclusive moments that non-participants feel compelled to discuss, amplifying reach beyond actual participants.

The Endowment Effect: Kahneman, Knetsch, and Thaler’s (1991) research shows people value items more highly once they possess them. Drop marketing’s scarcity ensures that those who successfully obtain products become more invested brand advocates, creating authentic enthusiasm that money cannot buy.

1.4 The Attention Economy Framework

Stunt advertising must be understood within the context of attention economics. As Davenport and Beck (2001) argue, “attention is the currency of the information age” (p. 20). In environments of information abundance, attention becomes the scarce resource.

Traditional advertising operates on an interruption model: brands pay to interrupt consumption experiences with their messages. However, interruption effectiveness has declined precipitously. Bang and Wojdynski (2016) found that banner ad click-through rates have fallen below 0.1%, and Nielsen (2015) reported that 84% of millennials dislike advertising and avoid it when possible.

Stunt advertising flips this model. Rather than interrupting valuable content, stunts become the content. They generate what Jenkins, Ford, and Green (2013) term “spreadable media”—content audiences actively want to share and discuss. The metric shifts from impressions delivered to engagement generated.

1.5 Guerrilla Marketing Evolution

Stunt advertising evolved from guerrilla marketing principles established by Levinson (1984), which emphasized unconventional tactics, minimal budgets, and maximum imagination. However, modern stunt advertising has evolved beyond pure guerrilla tactics in several ways:

Orchestration vs. Improvisation: While early guerrilla marketing prized scrappy improvisation, contemporary stunt advertising often involves elaborate orchestration, significant budgets, and careful pre-planning (Hutter & Hoffmann, 2011).

Integration vs. Isolation: Modern stunts integrate across channels, designed from inception to create social media moments, influencer amplification, and media coverage rather than existing as isolated physical activations (Mangold & Faulds, 2009).

Measurement Sophistication: Contemporary stunt advertising employs sophisticated attribution modeling, sentiment analysis, and earned media valuation that would have been impossible in the guerrilla marketing era (Hoffman & Fodor, 2010).

---

Part II: The SPARK Framework

SPARK stands for:

• Surprise (Pattern Disruption)
• Participation (Engagement Architecture)
• Amplification (Shareability Design)
• Relevance (Cultural Resonance)
• Kinetics (Momentum Building)

2.1 S – Surprise: Engineering the Unexpected

Surprise serves as the entry point for stunt advertising effectiveness. Without surprise, you merely have conventional marketing in unusual locations.

The Surprise Spectrum

Not all surprises are created equal. Research by Derbaix and Vanhamme (2003) identifies a spectrum of surprise intensity:

1. Mild Surprise: Minor expectation violations (15-30% attention increase)
2. Moderate Surprise: Significant but comprehensible deviations (40-70% attention increase)
3. Extreme Surprise: Reality-bending experiences (80-150% attention increase, but higher risk)

Actionable Structure: The Surprise Architecture Template

When designing surprise elements, use this framework:

Context Analysis

• What does the audience expect in this environment?
• What are the governing schemas and patterns?
• Where are the vulnerabilities in expectation?

Expectation Mapping

• Baseline Expectation: [What people assume will happen]
• Violation Point: [Where/when you’ll break the pattern]
• Violation Magnitude: [How dramatically you’ll deviate]
• Resolution Path: [How you’ll connect disruption to brand]

Example Application: Context: Morning commute in subway station Baseline Expectation: Static advertisements, rushing commuters, predictable routine Violation Point: Commuter reaches for “advertisement” that’s actually a dimensional installation Violation Magnitude: High—transforms 2D expectation into 3D reality Resolution Path: Product reveal showing how brand “breaks through the flat”

The Surprise-Brand Connection

Critical insight: Surprise must connect meaningfully to brand positioning. Disconnected surprise generates attention but not brand lift (Pauwels et al., 2004).

The LINK Method for connecting surprise to brand:

Leverage brand attributes: What brand qualities can surprise demonstrate? Illustrate product benefits: How can the surprise showcase what you offer? Narrative alignment: Does this surprise fit your brand story? Keystone moment: Does this create a memorable mental anchor for your brand?

Poor Example: A luxury watch brand staging a flash mob. High surprise, low brand connection.

Strong Example: TAG Heuer’s “Don’t Crack Under Pressure” campaign placed their watches in a giant ice cube in Milan, which slowly melted over days. Surprise (unexpected format) + brand alignment (watch’s water resistance) + product demonstration (watch survives as ice melts).

2.2 P – Participation: Designing Engagement Architecture

Modern stunt advertising transcends passive observation. The most effective stunts create participatory experiences that transform audiences into active co-creators (Pine & Gilmore, 2011).

The Participation Ladder

Research by Bernoff and Li (2008) on social media engagement reveals that audiences exist at different participation levels. Effective stunt advertising provides multiple entry points:

Tier 1: Observation (Lowest commitment)

• Can people enjoy by watching?
• Is there spectacle value without participation?
• Design for: Bystanders, media coverage, passive social scrollers

Tier 2: Light Interaction (Low-moderate commitment)

• Can people engage with minimal effort?
• Is there a quick, fun action available?
• Design for: Photo opportunities, simple games, immediate gratification

Tier 3: Active Participation (Moderate-high commitment)

• Can people immerse in an experience?
• Is there a meaningful activity requiring time?
• Design for: Experience seekers, content creators, brand enthusiasts

Tier 4: Co-Creation (Highest commitment)

• Can people contribute to the outcome?
• Can participants shape the stunt itself?
• Design for: Superfans, influencers, community builders

Actionable Structure: The Participation Design Canvas

Objective: [What action do you want people to take?]

Friction Analysis:

• Physical barriers: [Location, accessibility, requirements]
• Cognitive barriers: [Confusion, complexity, understanding]
• Social barriers: [Embarrassment, judgment, self-consciousness]
• Time barriers: [How long does participation take?]

Friction Reduction Strategies:

• [How will you minimize each barrier?]

Reward Design:

• Intrinsic rewards: [Fun, satisfaction, accomplishment]
• Social rewards: [Shareability, social currency, status]
• Tangible rewards: [Prizes, products, exclusive access]

Example Application: Objective: Get people to interact with our new smartphone’s camera features

Friction Analysis:

• Physical: People must be on-location (HIGH FRICTION)
• Cognitive: Understanding what to do (MEDIUM FRICTION)
• Social: Using phone in public (LOW FRICTION—already normalized)
• Time: 3-5 minutes (MEDIUM FRICTION)

Friction Reduction:

• Physical: Choose high-traffic location, extend activation time
• Cognitive: Clear signage, staff facilitators, intuitive interface
• Social: Create “Instagrammable” moments that encourage phone use
• Time: Make experience valuable enough to justify investment

Reward Design:

• Intrinsic: Fun photo transformations, creative expression
• Social: Shareable AI-enhanced photos with campaign hashtag
• Tangible: Enter to win the phone by sharing your creation

2.3 A – Amplification: Engineering Shareability

The most brilliant stunt means nothing if nobody hears about it. Amplification must be designed into the stunt from conception, not added afterward.

The Shareability Formula

Berger (2013) identifies six STEPPS principles that make content viral:

1. Social Currency: Does sharing make people look good?
2. Triggers: Is there something to remind people about it?
3. Emotion: Does it make people feel something?
4. Public: Is the behavior observable to others?
5. Practical Value: Is it useful to share?
6. Stories: Is there a narrative worth retelling?

Effective stunt advertising scores high on multiple STEPPS dimensions simultaneously.

Platform-Specific Amplification Design

Different platforms require different optimization approaches (Smith, Fischer, & Yongjian, 2012):

Instagram/TikTok Optimization:

• Visual distinctiveness (stands out in feed scroll)
• Vertical-friendly orientation or compositions
• Clear, identifiable brand elements that survive screenshot
• Moment-capture triggers (make people want to film it)
• Hashtag strategy built into physical space

Twitter/X Optimization:

• Conceptual cleverness (ideas worth discussing)
• Debate-worthy elements (creates conversation threads)
• Quotable moments or phrases
• Timeliness or cultural relevance
• Clear one-sentence summary for viral spread

YouTube/Long-form Optimization:

• Story arc (beginning, middle, end)
• Rewatchability or discovery of new details
• Educational or behind-the-scenes value
• Emotional journey worth experiencing fully

Actionable Structure: The Amplification Blueprint

Pre-Event Amplification

• Teaser strategy: [How will you build anticipation?]
• Influencer seeding: [Who gets advance access/information?]
• Mystery elements: [What will you keep secret to maintain intrigue?]
• Calendar timing: [When maximizes attention availability?]

During-Event Amplification

• Live coverage plan: [Who films/broadcasts real-time?]
• Hashtag strategy: [What’s memorable, unique, on-brand?]
• Participant incentives: [Why should attendees share?]
• Media access: [How do press get best vantage/access?]
• Remote participation: [How can non-attendees engage?]

Post-Event Amplification

• Content asset creation: [What polished materials will you release?]
• Story evolution: [How does narrative develop over time?]
• Community engagement: [How will you respond and interact?]
• Second-wave content: [What behind-scenes content extends life?]
• Measurement showcase: [Will you publicize results to generate coverage?]

Example Application: Red Bull Stratos

Pre-Event: Months of build-up, technical preparation coverage, live stream promotion During-Event: Multi-angle live streaming, real-time social media, global media partnerships Post-Event: Documentary film, educational content, record certification, continuing science conversations

Result: 8+ million concurrent viewers, billions of impressions, years of ongoing content value.

2.4 R – Relevance: Achieving Cultural Resonance

The most shareable stunt in the world fails if it doesn’t resonate with your audience’s values, interests, or cultural moment. Relevance determines whether attention converts to brand affinity (Holt, 2004).

Cultural Listening and Trend Identification

Effective stunt advertising requires what McCracken (1986) terms “cultural competence”—deep understanding of the symbolic meanings, values, and conversations active in target audiences.

The Cultural Relevance Audit:

1. Values Alignment

• What does your target audience care deeply about?
• What causes, movements, or ideas animate them?
• How does your brand intersect with these values?

2. Conversation Mapping

• What are they discussing on social platforms?
• What memes, references, or cultural touchstones dominate?
• Where are the white spaces in these conversations?

3. Moment Identification

• What events, anniversaries, or occasions matter?
• What seasonal or cyclical moments are relevant?
• What emerging trends are reaching critical mass?

4. Tension Spotting

• What frustrations or pain points exist?
• What absurdities or contradictions are people noticing?
• Where is there energy for change or disruption?

The Risk-Relevance Balance

High cultural relevance often involves higher risk. Touching on political, social, or controversial topics can backfire spectacularly if mishandled (Vredenburg et al., 2020).

The Authenticity Test:

• Do we have standing to speak on this topic?
• Have we demonstrated commitment beyond marketing?
• Could this be perceived as opportunistic?
• Are we prepared for critical response?
• Do we have diverse perspectives reviewing this?

Safe Relevance Zones: Product innovation, industry disruption, audience passion points, positive cultural moments

High-Risk Zones: Political movements, social justice issues (without authentic commitment), tragedy or crisis, divisive cultural debates

Actionable Structure: The Relevance Matrix

Create a 2×2 matrix evaluating potential stunt concepts:

Axis 1: Audience Interest (Low to High) Axis 2: Brand Authenticity (Forced to Natural)

High Interest + Natural Fit: EXECUTE These are your strongest opportunities. The stunt addresses something audiences care about in ways that feel natural to your brand.

High Interest + Forced Fit: AVOID These are “trend-jacking” traps. High visibility but potential authenticity backlash.

Low Interest + Natural Fit: DEVELOP These might work for niche audiences or need creative development to increase interest.

Low Interest + Forced Fit: REJECT Dead zone. Neither interesting nor authentic.

2.5 K – Kinetics: Building and Sustaining Momentum

Unlike traditional campaigns with defined start and end dates, successful stunt advertising creates momentum that extends impact over time (Kim & Ko, 2012).

The Momentum Curve

Stunt advertising follows a predictable momentum pattern:

Phase 1: Anticipation (Pre-Launch)

• Building awareness
• Creating curiosity
• Seeding influencers
• Media outreach

Phase 2: Ignition (Launch Moment)

• Maximum surprise impact
• Immediate capture and sharing
• Real-time engagement
• Media coverage spike

Phase 3: Amplification (Days 1-7)

• Content propagation across platforms
• Conversation development
• Secondary coverage (analysis, reaction)
• Community participation

Phase 4: Extension (Weeks 2-8)

• Sustained engagement
• Behind-scenes content
• Case study coverage
• Industry recognition

Phase 5: Legacy (Months+)

• Cultural reference point
• Case study in trade publications
• Award submissions
• Portfolio piece

Actionable Structure: The Momentum Maintenance Plan

Pre-Launch (Weeks Before)

• Countdown content schedule: [What gets released when?]
• Partner activation timeline: [When do collaborators tease?]
• Press embargo strategy: [What outlets get early access?]
• Community seeding: [How do you prime your audience?]

Launch Day (Hour-by-Hour)

• Hour 1: [Immediate response plan]
• Hours 2-6: [Engagement strategy]
• Hours 7-24: [Sustained activity plan]
• Content release cadence: [What materials drop when?]

Week 1 (Day-by-Day)

• Days 1-2: [Initial wave content]
• Days 3-4: [Behind-scenes content]
• Days 5-7: [Community highlights, UGC showcase]

Weeks 2-4

• Long-form content release
• Measurement and results sharing
• Industry commentary and analysis
• Extended storylines or reveals

Months 2-6

• Award submissions
• Case study development
• Speaking opportunities
• Trade publication features

Example: IKEA’s Sleepover Stunt

IKEA allowed 100 Facebook fans to have a sleepover in their showroom, responding to a joke post.

Kinetics Analysis:

• Pre-launch: Facebook conversation created organic anticipation
• Ignition: Overnight event with participant sharing in real-time
• Amplification: Participant photos, media coverage, viral discussion
• Extension: IKEA released professional photos, participant testimonials
• Legacy: Case study cited for years as responsive marketing example

---

Part III: Execution Strategies and Tactical Playbooks

3.1 The Stunt Advertising Taxonomy

Different stunt types serve different strategic objectives. Understanding which type aligns with your goals is critical for success.

Type 1: Spectacle Stunts

Definition: Large-scale, visually dramatic events designed to create awe (Schmitt, 1999).

Strategic Objective: Brand awareness, media coverage, establishing market presence

Characteristics:

• High production value
• Physical impressiveness
• Photogenic qualities
• Often outdoor/public spaces

Examples:

• Red Bull’s space jump
• Carlsberg’s bikers billboard transformation
• Coca-Cola’s Happiness Machine

When to Use: New product launches, market entry, rebranding, breaking through clutter in mature markets

Budget Consideration: Typically $100K-$5M+ depending on scale

Risk Level: Medium—requires permits, insurance, safety considerations

Type 2: Participation Stunts

Definition: Interactive experiences that require audience engagement (Pine & Gilmore, 2011).

Strategic Objective: Product trial, experience creation, community building, user-generated content

Characteristics:

• Interactive elements
• Memorable personal experiences
• Shareable moments built-in
• Often limited capacity

Examples:

• Refinery29’s 29Rooms experiential installations
• Museum of Ice Cream’s immersive environments
• Nike’s pop-up run clubs in new cities

When to Use: Experience-driven products, building brand communities, generating authentic content

Budget Consideration: $50K-$500K depending on complexity

Risk Level: Medium-high—must manage capacity, safety, participant satisfaction

Type 3: Disruption Stunts

Definition: Unexpected interventions in everyday environments that violate expectations (Hutter & Hoffmann, 2011).

Strategic Objective: Pattern interruption, memorability, demonstrating product benefits

Characteristics:

• Surprise as core element
• Often guerrilla tactics
• Minimal audience preparation
• Public space activation

Examples:

• Deadpool’s Tinder profile for movie promotion
• Spotify’s data-driven billboards (“Dear person who played ‘Sorry’ 42 times on Valentine’s Day”)
• Burger King’s “Whopper Detour” geofencing McDonald’s

When to Use: Challenging category leader, demonstrating product superiority, creating controversy

Budget Consideration: $25K-$250K typically

Risk Level: High—potential for negative reactions, legal issues, or backfire

Type 4: Drop Stunts

Definition: Surprise releases or limited-availability offerings designed to create urgency (Cialdini, 2006).

Strategic Objective: Creating scarcity, rewarding fans, generating immediate action, building hype

Characteristics:

• Time-limited or quantity-limited
• Often unannounced or minimal notice
• Creates secondary market value
• Rewards early adopters

Examples:

• Supreme’s weekly limited drops
• Beyoncé’s surprise album releases
• Tesla’s surprise product announcements during earnings calls

When to Use: Strong existing fan base, premium or limited products, building anticipation for broader launches

Budget Consideration: Variable—can be low-cost but requires inventory/production

Risk Level: Medium—can frustrate excluded customers, requires strong demand

Type 5: Provocation Stunts

Definition: Deliberately controversial or boundary-pushing activations designed to spark debate (Holt & Cameron, 2010).

Strategic Objective: Generating conversation, positioning brand as bold/edgy, breaking category conventions

Characteristics:

• Inherently polarizing
• Generates debate
• Often social commentary
• Requires conviction to maintain position

Examples:

• Protein World’s “Are you beach body ready?” campaign (controversial body image)
• Greggs’ vegan sausage roll launch trolling Piers Morgan
• Cards Against Humanity buying land to block Trump’s border wall

When to Use: Bold brand positioning, when category needs disruption, when you have conviction in your stance

Budget Consideration: Variable—idea-driven more than production-heavy

Risk Level: Very High—can alienate audiences, generate backlash, damage brand

Critical Warning: Only execute if you’re prepared to stand by position amid criticism.

3.2 The Location Strategy Matrix

Where you execute matters enormously. The environment shapes interpretation, accessibility, and shareability (Petermans & Van Cleempoel, 2010).

Location Archetypes

High-Traffic Public Spaces

• Examples: Times Square, transit stations, shopping districts
• Advantages: Maximum visibility, diverse audience, media familiarity
• Challenges: Permit requirements, high costs, competition for attention
• Best For: Spectacle stunts, broad awareness goals

Cultural Landmarks

• Examples: Famous buildings, monuments, recognizable locations
• Advantages: Inherent shareability, tourist traffic, symbolic resonance
• Challenges: Restricted access, reverence expectations, permit complexity
• Best For: Brand elevation, connecting to cultural meaning

Unexpected/Unusual Spaces

• Examples: Subways, elevators, bathrooms, parking lots
• Advantages: Genuine surprise, captive audience, novelty
• Challenges: Access logistics, variable traffic, potential negative associations
• Best For: Disruption stunts, demonstrating unexpected brand qualities

Digital-First Locations

• Examples: Platform takeovers, AR experiences, online spaces
• Advantages: Scalability, data tracking, lower production costs
• Challenges: Achieving breakthrough, platform dependency, shorter attention spans
• Best For: Tech-savvy audiences, digital products, cost efficiency

Contextually Relevant Locations

• Examples: Product environment, competitive locations, problem spaces
• Advantages: Natural brand connection, demonstrates relevance, targeted audience
• Challenges: May limit reach, requires creative connection
• Best For: Product demonstrations, competitive positioning

Actionable Structure: Location Decision Framework

Audience Concentration

• Where does your target audience spend time?
• When are they most receptive to interruption?
• What locations align with their lifestyle?

Symbolic Alignment

• What does this location communicate?
• How does place meaning transfer to brand?
• Does environment reinforce or contradict message?

Practical Accessibility

• Can you secure necessary permissions?
• What are infrastructure requirements (power, space, etc.)?
• What are safety and liability considerations?
• How will you manage crowd control?

Amplification Potential

• Is location recognizable in photos/video?
• Does environment enhance or detract from shareability?
• Can media easily access and cover?
• Are there natural sightlines for observation?

Cost-Benefit Analysis

• What are location-specific costs (permits, rent, etc.)?
• Does foot traffic justify investment?
• Are there multi-use opportunities?

3.3 Timing and Calendar Strategy

When you launch is as important as what you launch (Sahni & Nair, 2020).

The Optimal Timing Framework

Attention Availability

• When is your audience mentally available?
• What competing events or moments exist?
• What’s the news cycle environment?

Cultural Calendar

• What events, holidays, or seasons are relevant?
• Are there industry-specific timing considerations?
• What are you counter-programming against?

Daypart Optimization

• What times maximize physical attendance?
• When do social platforms see peak engagement?
• How does timing affect media coverage windows?

Sustained Engagement Potential

• Does timing allow momentum building?
• Are you launching before a dead period (holidays, etc.)?
• How does timing affect content lifespan?

Actionable Structure: The Timing Strategy Canvas

Ideal Launch Date Range: [Specific dates with rationale]

Supporting Factors:

• Cultural moment: [What makes this timing relevant?]
• Competitive window: [Why is this opportune in your market?]
• Resource availability: [When can you execute well?]
• Weather/seasonal: [What environmental factors matter?]

Risk Factors:

• Competing events: [What could overshadow you?]
• Controversial timing: [Could timing be insensitive?]
• Operational constraints: [What could prevent execution?]

Contingency Dates: [Alternative dates if primary is unavailable]

Example: Primary Launch: Tuesday, October 15, 2:00 PM EST

Supporting Factors:

• Mid-week avoids weekend news burial
• 2 PM allows morning prep, afternoon media coverage, evening news inclusion
• Mid-month avoids month-end business pressures
• Fall timing aligns with product launch season

Risk Factors:

• Check for: Major news events, earnings announcements, competitor launches
• Weather backup plan for outdoor elements

3.4 Building Your Stunt Team

Successful execution requires diverse expertise (Lurie, 2012). Most brands underestimate team requirements.

Core Team Roles

Creative Director

• Responsibilities: Concept development, brand alignment, creative integrity
• Skills: Creative vision, brand strategy, storytelling
• Hire when: Need original concept development

Production Manager

• Responsibilities: Logistics, vendor management, timeline, budget
• Skills: Project management, problem-solving, vendor relationships
• Hire when: Concept is approved and moving to execution

PR/Communications Lead

• Responsibilities: Media strategy, press relations, message development
• Skills: Media relationships, storytelling, crisis communication
• Hire when: From concept phase through post-launch

Social Media Strategist

• Responsibilities: Platform strategy, content creation, community management
• Skills: Platform expertise, real-time engagement, analytics
• Hire when: Design phase to ensure shareability is built in

Legal Counsel

• Responsibilities: Permit acquisition, liability management, compliance
• Skills: Entertainment/marketing law, risk assessment
• Hire when: Concept phase, before any public commitment

Safety/Risk Manager

• Responsibilities: Safety protocols, insurance, contingency planning
• Skills: Risk assessment, safety regulations, emergency response
• Hire when: Any stunt involving public participation or physical risk

Documentation Team

• Responsibilities: Photo, video, content capture
• Skills: Photography, videography, real-time editing
• Hire when: Production phase through execution

Community Manager

• Responsibilities: Real-time social engagement, sentiment monitoring
• Skills: Social listening, rapid response, community building
• Hire when: Launch through post-campaign period

Actionable Structure: Team Assembly Checklist

For each role:

• [ ] Role necessity assessment (critical/helpful/optional)
• [ ] Internal vs. external resource
• [ ] If external: RFP development and vendor selection
• [ ] Onboarding and briefing completion
• [ ] Clear responsibility assignment (RACI matrix)
• [ ] Communication protocol establishment

---

Part IV: Risk Management and Legal Considerations

Stunt advertising operates at the boundary of conventional marketing, which inherently involves risk. Mature risk management separates successful campaigns from disasters (Coombs, 2015).

4.1 The Risk Assessment Framework

Every stunt concept should undergo systematic risk evaluation before greenlight.

Risk Categories

Legal Risks

• Permit violations or lack of approvals
• Trademark/copyright infringement
• Privacy violations (filming people without consent)
• False advertising claims
• Contractual breaches with partners/venues

Safety Risks

• Participant injury
• Bystander harm
• Property damage
• Crowd control failures
• Emergency response inadequacy

Reputational Risks

• Offense to audiences or communities
• Misalignment with brand values
• Tone-deaf cultural insensitivity
• Perceived opportunism or exploitation
• Association with negative events

Execution Risks

• Technical failure (technology doesn’t work)
• Weather or environmental interference
• Vendor/partner failure
• Insufficient participation
• Logistical breakdown

Financial Risks

• Budget overruns
• Insufficient ROI
• Unexpected costs (legal defense, cleanup, etc.)
• Contractual penalties
• Lost opportunity costs

4.2 Actionable Structure: The Risk Mitigation Matrix

For each identified risk:

Risk Description: [Specific risk] Probability: [Low/Medium/High] Impact if Occurs: [Low/Medium/High] Priority Score: [Probability × Impact]

Mitigation Strategy:

• Prevention: [How to reduce probability]
• Detection: [How to identify if occurring]
• Response: [What to do if it happens]
• Recovery: [How to restore normal operations]

Responsible Party: [Who owns this risk] Budget Allocation: [Resources for mitigation]

Example:

Risk: Stunt offends cultural community

Probability: Medium

Impact: High (potential boycott, media backlash)

Mitigation Strategy:

• Prevention: Diverse creative review team, cultural consultants, focus group testing
• Detection: Social listening during launch, monitoring sentiment signals
• Response: Pre-prepared apology templates, executive authorization for statement, pause on amplification
• Recovery: Community engagement, donation to relevant organizations, policy commitment

Responsible Party: CMO and PR Lead

Budget: $15K for consultants, $50K contingency for response

4.3 Legal Clearance Checklist

Permits and Approvals

• [ ] Location permits secured
• [ ] Filming permits for public spaces
• [ ] Special event permits if creating gathering
• [ ] Health department approvals (if food/beverage)
• [ ] Fire marshal clearance (if pyrotechnics, crowds)

Intellectual Property

• [ ] All music properly licensed
• [ ] No trademark infringement on competitors
• [ ] Talent releases for anyone featured
• [ ] Location releases signed
• [ ] Any parody/satire reviewed by counsel

Safety and Insurance

• [ ] Liability insurance adequate for scale
• [ ] Additional insured endorsements for location
• [ ] Worker’s compensation for staff/contractors
• [ ] Weather/cancellation insurance (if high-budget)

Privacy and Consent

• [ ] Clear signage about filming
• [ ] Consent mechanisms for participants
• [ ] GDPR/privacy law compliance for data collection
• [ ] Minor participation protocols (parental consent)

Contractual

• [ ] Vendor contracts with clear deliverables
• [ ] Force majeure clauses for cancellation scenarios
• [ ] Confidentiality agreements with all parties
• [ ] Clear intellectual property ownership

4.4 Crisis Response Protocols

Despite best planning, crises can occur. Having protocols established before execution is critical (Coombs, 2007).

The Crisis Response Framework

Tier 1: Minor Issues (Social Media Complaints, Small Technical Glitches)

• Response Time: Within 2 hours
• Authority Level: Social media manager with approval template
• Action: Acknowledge, apologize if appropriate, explain resolution

Tier 2: Moderate Issues (Significant negative coverage, operational failures)

• Response Time: Within 4 hours
• Authority Level: Marketing director with legal review
• Action: Formal statement, operational adjustment, stakeholder communication

Tier 3: Major Crisis (Safety incidents, widespread offense, legal threats)

• Response Time: Within 1 hour
• Authority Level: Executive leadership with full counsel review
• Action: Immediate pause of campaign, investigation, comprehensive response plan

Actionable Structure: Crisis Response Playbook

Pre-Crisis Preparation

• Crisis team roster with 24/7 contact information
• Decision tree for issue escalation
• Pre-approved statement templates
• Media spokesperson designation
• Legal counsel on standby

During Crisis

• Rapid assessment protocol (15-minute huddle)
• Stakeholder notification sequence
• Social media pause mechanisms
• Documentation of all decisions
• Regular update cadence

Post-Crisis

• Comprehensive incident report
• Lessons learned documentation
• Process improvement implementation
• Stakeholder relationship repair
• Public accountability (if appropriate)

---

Part V: Measurement and Attribution

“What gets measured gets managed” (Drucker, 2006, p. 45). Stunt advertising requires sophisticated measurement frameworks that capture value beyond traditional metrics.

5.1 The Measurement Hierarchy

Primary Metrics (Direct Value)

Reach and Impressions

• Physical attendance/observation
• Media impressions (earned, owned, paid)
• Social media impressions
• Video views
• Website traffic

Engagement

• Social media engagement rate (likes, comments, shares)
• Time spent with activation
• Content creation (UGC volume)
• Hashtag usage
• Search volume increase

Sentiment

• Positive vs. negative mentions
• Brand sentiment shift
• Key message comprehension
• Emotional response analysis

Conversion

• Website conversion rate change
• Sales lift during and post-campaign
• Lead generation
• App downloads
• Store visits (if trackable)

Secondary Metrics (Indirect Value)

Earned Media Value (EMV)

• Calculate: (Impressions × Industry CPM) for all earned coverage
• Industry standard: Use PR-equivalent ad value
• Caution: EMV is imperfect but useful for executive reporting

Share of Voice

• Your brand mentions vs. competitor mentions during campaign
• Percentage of category conversation

Brand Health Metrics

• Awareness (aided and unaided)
• Consideration
• Preference
• Brand association shifts

Long-Term Value

• Customer lifetime value of acquired customers
• Brand equity measurement
• Ongoing organic search benefit
• Content asset longevity

5.2 Actionable Structure: The Measurement Plan Template

Campaign: [Name] Duration: [Dates] Budget: [Total investment]

Business Objective: [What business goal does this support?]

Primary Success Metric: [The #1 number that determines success] Target: [Specific, measurable goal]

Secondary Metrics:

1. [Metric]: Target [number]
2. [Metric]: Target [number]
3. [Metric]: Target [number]

Measurement Methods:

• [Metric]: [How you’ll track it]
• [Tools/platforms to use]
• [Baseline measurement date]
• [Reporting frequency]

Attribution Approach:

• How will you isolate campaign impact?
• What control mechanisms exist?
• How will you account for other variables?

Reporting Schedule:

• Real-time dashboard: [What metrics, update frequency]
• Daily summary: [To whom, what format]
• Week 1 report: [Preliminary results]
• Final report: [Comprehensive analysis, due date]

5.3 Attribution Challenges and Solutions

Stunt advertising creates attribution complexity. The impact ripples across channels and time, making causation difficult to prove.

Challenge 1: Multi-Touch Attribution Problem: People encounter stunt through multiple channels (see it in person, see media coverage, see social posts) Solution: Use incremental lift studies comparing markets with vs. without stunt exposure

Challenge 2: Long Conversion Windows Problem: Impact may not convert immediately Solution: Track extended conversion windows (30, 60, 90 days) and compare to baseline

Challenge 3: Organic Amplification Problem: Unpaid sharing makes reach calculation complex Solution: Use social listening platforms with reach estimation algorithms, acknowledge uncertainty ranges

Challenge 4: Brand Halo Effects Problem: Stunts may affect perception without immediate conversion Solution: Pre/post brand tracking studies measuring awareness, perception, consideration shifts

5.4 ROI Calculation Framework

For executive reporting, translating activity into ROI is critical despite imperfect attribution.

Total Investment

• Production costs
• Media amplification
• Agency/vendor fees
• Staff time (internal labor)
• Location/permit costs
• Insurance and legal
• Content creation
• Tools and technology

Total Value Generated

• Earned media value
• Owned media value (content assets created)
• Social engagement value (engagement × benchmark value)
• Direct conversion value (sales, leads × value)
• Brand lift value (awareness increase × customer base × LTV)

ROI Calculation ROI = (Total Value – Total Investment) / Total Investment × 100

Example:

• Investment: $250,000
• Earned media value: $800,000
• Direct sales lift: $150,000
• Brand lift estimated value: $200,000
• Total Value: $1,150,000
• ROI: ($1,150,000 – $250,000) / $250,000 = 360%

Critical Note: Be transparent about methodology. Different stakeholders may value components differently.

---

Part VI: Case Study Deep Dives

Case Study 1: Fearless Girl Statue

Brand: State Street Global Advisors Objective: Promote gender diversity on corporate boards, launch SHE fund (gender diversity ETF) Execution: Bronze statue of young girl placed facing Wall Street’s Charging Bull, installed overnight before International Women’s Day

SPARK Analysis:

Surprise: Unexpected appearance, powerful symbolic positioning, overnight installation Participation: Became photo destination, social media phenomenon, physical pilgrimage site Amplification: 4.5 billion earned impressions globally, hashtag #FearlessGirl trended, celebrity sharing Relevance: International Women’s Day timing, ongoing corporate diversity conversations, #MeToo era cultural momentum Kinetics: Temporary installation extended permanently due to public response, won numerous advertising awards, continues generating coverage years later

Results:

• $7.4M investment yielded estimated $125M+ earned media value
• SHE fund attracted $250M in initial investments
• 1,900% increase in State Street’s LinkedIn followers
• Grand Prix Cannes Lion winner

Key Lessons:

1. Symbolism amplifies message beyond execution
2. Public demand can extend planned duration
3. Cultural timing multiplies impact
4. Physical presence beats pure digital in memorability

Case Study 2: Burger King’s “Whopper Detour”

Brand: Burger King Objective: Drive app downloads and foot traffic, competitive positioning vs. McDonald’s Execution: Geofenced every McDonald’s in America; within 600 feet, Burger King app users could purchase a Whopper for 1 cent, but had to travel to BK to redeem

SPARK Analysis:

Surprise: Audacious competitive trolling, technology-enabled unexpectedness, pricing disruption Participation: Required app download and physical journey, gamified the experience Amplification: Media loved competitive aggression story, tech innovation angle, customer sharing journeys Relevance: Ongoing burger wars narrative, mobile ordering trend, consumer love of deals Kinetics: 9-day limited promotion created urgency, post-campaign analysis and awards extended conversation

Results:

• 1.5M app downloads in 9 days (became #1 downloaded app)
• 37M earned media impressions
• 3.5x return on ad spend
• Titanium Grand Prix Cannes Lion

Key Lessons:

1. Technology enables new stunt formats
2. Competitive targeting generates media interest
3. Time limitation drives urgency
4. Physical journey creates memorable experience

Case Study 3: Spotify Wrapped

Brand: Spotify Objective: Year-end engagement, user retention, data showcasing Execution: Annual personalized summary of each user’s listening habits, shareable graphics, cultural moment

SPARK Analysis:

Surprise: Initially surprising first year, now anticipated (proving stunts can become traditions) Participation: Personalized for every user, sharing encouraged and facilitated Amplification: Built-in shareability, celebrities participate, media coverage as cultural phenomenon Relevance: Year-end reflection timing, identity expression through music taste, social currency Kinetics: Multi-day social media domination, generates anticipation throughout November

Results:

• 60M+ social shares annually
• Dominates social media for 48+ hours
• Drives app engagement and premium conversions
• Created copycat campaigns across industries

Key Lessons:

1. Personalization at scale creates individual advocacy
2. Anticipated stunts can still succeed (Wrapped is now expected but effective)
3. Data storytelling creates shareability
4. Platform-native execution maximizes participation

Case Study 4: Dove’s “Real Beauty Sketches”

Brand: Dove Objective: Promote “Real Beauty” campaign positioning, emotional connection Execution: FBI-trained sketch artist drew women based on their self-descriptions, then based on stranger descriptions, revealing self-perception gaps

SPARK Analysis:

Surprise: Emotional reveal, psychological depth unexpected in advertising Participation: Real participants (not actors) created authenticity Amplification: Emotional content drives sharing (became most-watched video ad ever at the time) Relevance: Self-esteem and body image issues, women’s empowerment conversations Kinetics: Video evergreen quality, ongoing discussion in psychology and sociology contexts

Results:

• 114M views in one month
• 3.8B earned media impressions
• Covered by 33 TV shows
• 650% increase in brand talk

Key Lessons:

1. Emotion trumps production value
2. Psychological insights create depth
3. Authentic participants beat actors
4. Alignment with brand purpose creates believability

---

Part VII: Advanced Tactics and Innovation

7.1 Technology-Enabled Stunts

Technology continuously creates new stunt possibilities (Grewal & Roggeveen, 2020).

Augmented Reality (AR) Stunts

• Pokémon GO proved AR can drive physical behavior
• IKEA Place app lets customers AR-visualize furniture
• Pepsi’s AR bus shelter created unbelievable scenes

Actionable Application: Create AR filters or experiences that:

• Demonstrate product benefits
• Create shareable moments
• Work in your product environment
• Are simple enough for mass adoption

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Integration

• Automated personalization at scale
• Real-time content generation
• Predictive optimization

Actionable Application:

• Use AI to personalize stunt experiences
• Deploy chatbots as campaign personalities
• Generate endless variations for different audiences

Geolocation and Proximity Marketing

• Location-based triggers
• Competitive geofencing
• Journey-based activations

Actionable Application:

• Trigger content when users near relevant locations
• Create treasure hunt-style experiences
• Reward proximity to your stores/products

7.2 The Controversy Calculation

Some stunts intentionally court controversy. This requires careful calculation (Wojdynski & Evans, 2020).

When Controversy Works:

• You have authentic conviction in position
• Your core audience shares the perspective
• You’re prepared for criticism
• Controversy aligns with brand positioning
• You can maintain position under pressure

When Controversy Backfires:

• Perceived as opportunistic
• Position is inconsistent with brand history
• Issues are too serious for commercial context
• You lack standing on the issue
• You’re unprepared for backlash intensity

The Controversy Decision Matrix:

Question 1: Do we genuinely believe in this position beyond marketing?

• If NO → Stop. Don’t pursue.
• If YES → Continue to Question 2

Question 2: Will this alienate current customers more than it attracts new ones?

• If YES → Reconsider. Calculate customer lifetime value implications.
• If NO → Continue to Question 3

Question 3: Can we sustain this position for years, not just a campaign?

• If NO → Stop. Inconsistency will backfire.
• If YES → Continue to Question 4

Question 4: Have we consulted diverse perspectives on potential harm?

• If NO → Stop and consult.
• If YES → Proceed with comprehensive crisis plan

7.3 Sustainability and Ethical Considerations

Modern audiences increasingly evaluate brands on values and impact (Cone Communications, 2017).

Sustainable Stunt Design:

• Minimize waste in construction and teardown
• Use biodegradable or reusable materials
• Calculate and offset carbon footprint
• Plan for material repurposing
• Document and promote sustainability efforts

Ethical Considerations:

• Labor practices in production
• Cultural appropriation risks
• Accessibility for disabled participants
• Data privacy in digital activations
• Transparency in sponsored content

Actionable Structure: The Ethics Audit

For each stunt concept, evaluate:

Environmental Impact:

• [ ] Materials sustainably sourced?
• [ ] Waste management plan exists?
• [ ] Carbon footprint calculated and offset?
• [ ] Reuse or recycling plan for materials?

Social Impact:

• [ ] Inclusive and accessible design?
• [ ] Cultural sensitivity review completed?
• [ ] Fair labor practices throughout supply chain?
• [ ] Positive community impact?

Privacy and Data:

• [ ] Transparent data collection practices?
• [ ] Minimum necessary data gathered?
• [ ] Clear opt-in mechanisms?
• [ ] GDPR and privacy law compliance?

Truth and Authenticity:

• [ ] Claims are truthful and substantiated?
• [ ] Sponsorships clearly disclosed?
• [ ] No deceptive practices?
• [ ] Authentic to brand purpose?

---

Part VIII: Templates and Tools

Template 1: The Stunt Concept Brief

Campaign Name: _______________________

Strategic Context

• Business Objective:
• Target Audience:
• Key Message:
• Success Definition:

Core Concept

• Big Idea (one sentence):
• How it works:
• Why it’s remarkable:

SPARK Evaluation

• Surprise: How does it violate expectations?
• Participation: How can audiences engage?
• Amplification: What makes it shareable?
• Relevance: Why does it matter now?
• Kinetics: How does it build momentum?

Execution Essentials

• Location:
• Timing:
• Duration:
• Team Requirements:
• Budget Estimate:

Risk Assessment

• Primary risks:
• Mitigation strategies:
• Crisis response plan:

Template 2: The Pre-Launch Checklist

Legal & Compliance (Due: 6 weeks before)

• [ ] All permits secured
• [ ] Insurance policies activated
• [ ] Contracts signed
• [ ] IP clearances obtained
• [ ] Privacy compliance verified

Production & Logistics (Due: 4 weeks before)

• [ ] Vendors confirmed
• [ ] Materials ordered
• [ ] Site inspection completed
• [ ] Load-in schedule confirmed
• [ ] Backup plans established

Communications & Media (Due: 3 weeks before)

• [ ] Press releases drafted
• [ ] Media list compiled
• [ ] Influencer outreach completed
• [ ] Social media calendar created
• [ ] Spokesperson prepared

Team & Training (Due: 2 weeks before)

• [ ] All team members briefed
• [ ] Safety training completed
• [ ] Communication protocols established
• [ ] Crisis response reviewed
• [ ] Roles and responsibilities confirmed

Technology & Tools (Due: 1 week before)

• [ ] All tech tested
• [ ] Backup systems ready
• [ ] Monitoring tools configured
• [ ] Documentation equipment prepared
• [ ] WiFi/connectivity confirmed

Final Preparations (Due: 24 hours before)

• [ ] Final site walkthrough
• [ ] Weather/conditions check
• [ ] Team rally/alignment
• [ ] Media confirmations
• [ ] Launch day plan reviewed

Template 3: The Post-Campaign Report

Executive Summary

• Campaign overview (2-3 sentences)
• Primary objective and result
• Overall success assessment

By the Numbers

Metric	Target	Actual	% of Target
Reach
Engagement
Conversions
EMV
ROI

Qualitative Outcomes

• Media coverage highlights
• Sentiment analysis
• Unexpected outcomes
• Cultural impact

What Worked

• Top 3 successes with analysis

What Didn’t

• Top 3 challenges with lessons learned

Recommendations

• For future campaigns
• Process improvements
• Capability building needs

Appendix

• Media clips compilation
• Social media analytics
• Photos/videos
• Detailed financial breakdown

---

Conclusion: The Future of Stunt Advertising

Stunt advertising will continue evolving as technology, culture, and media landscapes shift. Several trends are shaping the future:

Metaverse and Virtual Stunts: As virtual worlds mature, stunts will increasingly exist in digital spaces, blurring physical and virtual boundaries.

AI-Personalized Stunts: Artificial intelligence will enable stunts personalized to individual participants in real-time, creating millions of unique experiences from single concepts.

Values-Driven Activism: Audiences increasingly expect brands to take stands on social issues. Stunts will become vehicles for authentic advocacy, not just attention.

Micro-Stunts and Decentralization: Rather than single massive stunts, brands will orchestrate networks of smaller stunts activated by fans and communities.

Sustainability Imperatives: Environmental consciousness will demand stunts leave minimal footprints while maximizing impact.

The fundamental principles remain: create remarkable experiences worth discussing, design shareability from inception, connect authentically to your brand purpose, and execute with rigor and preparation. The SPARK Framework provides the foundation for success regardless of evolving tactics and technologies.

Stunt advertising, at its best, transcends commerce to create culture. It gives people stories to tell, moments to remember, and experiences that enrich their lives beyond product transactions. Done well, it represents marketing at its most creative, ambitious, and impactful.

---

References

Bang, H., & Wojdynski, B. W. (2016). Tracking users’ visual attention and responses to personalized advertising based on task cognitive demand. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 867-876.

Berger, J. (2013). Contagious: Why things catch on. Simon & Schuster.

Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192-205.

Bernoff, J., & Li, C. (2008). Harnessing the power of the oh-so-social web. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(3), 36-42.

Cialdini, R. B. (2006). Influence: The psychology of persuasion (Revised ed.). Harper Business.

Cone Communications. (2017). 2017 Cone Communications CSR Study. Cone Communications.

Coombs, W. T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(3), 163-176.

Coombs, W. T. (2015). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Davenport, T. H., & Beck, J. C. (2001). The attention economy: Understanding the new currency of business. Harvard Business School Press.

Derbaix, C., & Vanhamme, J. (2003). Inducing word-of-mouth by eliciting surprise: A pilot investigation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(1), 99-116.

Drucker, P. F. (2006). The effective executive: The definitive guide to getting the right things done. Harper Business.

Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127-138.

Godin, S. (2008). Tribes: We need you to lead us. Portfolio.

Grewal, D., & Roggeveen, A. L. (2020). Understanding retail experiences and customer journey management. Journal of Retailing, 96(1), 3-8.

Hoffman, D. L., & Fodor, M. (2010). Can you measure the ROI of your social media marketing? MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(1), 41-49.

Holt, D. B. (2004). How brands become icons: The principles of cultural branding. Harvard Business School Press.

Holt, D. B., & Cameron, D. (2010). Cultural strategy: Using innovative ideologies to build breakthrough brands. Oxford University Press.

Hunt, R. R. (1995). The subtlety of distinctiveness: What von Restorff really did. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2(1), 105-112.

Hutter, K., & Hoffmann, S. (2011). Guerrilla marketing: The nature of the concept and propositions for further research. Asian Journal of Marketing, 5(2), 39-54.

Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. NYU Press.

Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 193-206.

Kim, A. J., & Ko, E. (2012). Do social media marketing activities enhance customer equity? Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1480-1486.

Levinson, J. C. (1984). Guerrilla marketing: Secrets for making big profits from your small business. Houghton Mifflin.

Lurie, I. (2012). Content marketing: Think like a publisher. Que Publishing.

Mangold, W. G., & Faulds, D. J. (2009). Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business Horizons, 52(4), 357-365.

McCracken, G. (1986). Culture and consumption: A theoretical account of the structure and movement of the cultural meaning of consumer goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(1), 71-84.

McGaugh, J. L. (2004). The amygdala modulates the consolidation of memories of emotionally arousing experiences. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 1-28.

Nielsen. (2015). Global trust in advertising report. Nielsen Holdings.

Pauwels, K., Erguncu, S., & Yildirim, G. (2004). Winning hearts, minds and sales: How marketing communication enters the purchase process in emerging and mature markets. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(2), 171-184.

Petermans, A., & Van Cleempoel, K. (2010). Retail design: Lighting as an atmospheric tool, creating experiences which influence consumers’ mood and behaviour in commercial spaces. Proceedings of the Conference on Design & Emotion, 1-15.

Pieters, R., Warlop, L., & Wedel, M. (2002). Breaking through the clutter: Benefits of advertisement originality and familiarity for brand attention and memory. Management Science, 48(6), 765-781.

Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (2011). The experience economy (Updated ed.). Harvard Business Review Press.

Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1841-1848.

Sahni, N. S., & Nair, H. S. (2020). Does advertising serve as a signal? Evidence from a field experiment in mobile search. The Review of Economic Studies, 87(3), 1529-1564.

Schmitt, B. (1999). Experiential marketing: How to get customers to sense, feel, think, act, relate. The Free Press.

Smith, A. N., Fischer, E., & Yongjian, C. (2012). How does brand-related user-generated content differ across YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(2), 102-113.

Vredenburg, J., Kapitan, S., Spry, A., & Kemper, J. A. (2020). Brands taking a stand: Authentic brand activism or woke washing? Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 39(4), 444-460.

Wojdynski, B. W., & Evans, N. J. (2020). The covert advertising recognition and effects (CARE) model: Processes of persuasion in native advertising and other masked formats. International Journal of Advertising, 39(1), 4-31.